Introduction A couple of years back there were no contenders for this title. Today we have a wealth of choices. NOTE: I have made a decision to mainly highlight programs that meet 2 specific needs that I have: 1) the ability to search within files (find words within files) and 2) programs that will work across network shares (index files on my work network where all my documents are stored). There are literally tons of software programs that will search for files and folders, but that do not search within files. There are also several alternatives that might search network shares, but do not search within files. Again, my focus has been on programs that meet the primary needs I've identified above.
Download game moto gp 3d 320x240 jar. It is beyond my scope to review all types of desktop search tools. NOTE #2: I recently upgraded to Windows 7 (64-bit). To be honest, after upgrading and using Windows 7 built-in search tool, I see no reason to use a third-party desktop search tool.
It takes a little tweaking, but the new search tool within Windows 7 is quite good. It even searches within files and will search my home network for files. My recommendation is that if you are using Windows 7, you really don't need a third-party tool. For an excellent resource on how to maximize your use of the Windows 7 search tool, please check out this article. Rated Products. Google sidebar and gadgets. Large resource utilization.
Difficult to remove once installed. Does not appear to work with Outlook 2010. No longer being developed. Related Products and Links. indexes your entire hard disk and then you can search for a file by typing in part or all of the filename and it will display results as you type. Then just double click to run the file or right-click for the menu to open the path. The beauty of Everything is that it can be completely portable!
Everything was recently updated and now supports Windows 2000, XP, Vista, and Windows 7. (There is no mention of 32 bit or 64 bit on their website.) If all you are looking for is a specific file or folder, then this little program totally rocks! Cons: It does not have a right click preview of common file types (txt, doc, pdf, etc.). It works only on NTFS drives. And, Everything does not search file contents, only file and folder names. For home users, this is a serious contender for my top pick. It's been around for a while, but only recently has become totally freeware.
It's fast and the options are quite handy. It opens up in a browser window with preview options and other search options. Recently updated to version 4.6. Supports Windows 2000 (SP4), XP (SP2 and SP3), Vista/Vista SP1, Windows 7. Cons: I don't recommend Exalead Free version in a networked environment unless you have a ton of storage capacity. On my work laptop, the index file took up a HUGE 46 GB of storage space!
In addition, Exalead does not allow users any option about where the index files will be kept on computer. For an interesting review of this product, see. is an Open Source desktop search application: It allows you to quickly access documents on your computer by typing keywords. You can think of it as Google for your local document repository. The application is currently available for Windows and GTK-based Linux distributions. It does offer the ability to search within files (actually only certain document types).
A Java Runtime Environment (JRE), version 1.6.0 or higher, is required. Note: If you have a 64-bit OS, you might have to replace an installed 64-bit Java Runtime with its 32-bit counterpart in order to make DocFetcher work. 64-bit Java is currently not supported.
The Windows version runs on Windows XP or later. Windows 98 is not supported.
There is also a Linux version and a portable version. Cons: (though some might see this as a pro) It indexes documents only - pictures, music, videos, etc. is one of my favorites when I'm in a hurry.
It is very similar to Locate32. It does not index your hard drive, but is still relatively quick. It also has the ability to search within files. When searching the contents of files Agent Ransack displays the text found so you can quickly browse the results without having to separately open each file!
Have Your Say You are invited to share and discuss your views in our. To post in the forum you need to register first but that's quick and immediate. Alternatively, anyone can leave a comment at the bottom of this page.
Editor This software category is maintained by volunteer editor Kendall Alexander. Please rate this article. George, I think you saved my day (and my remaining hair). I have tried many of the other suggestions, and had not found one that did ALL of this - 1) I can have windows indexing switched off for eternity 2) It (the chosen search program) does not require a massive index, nor a massive indexing time 3) It can search within the files for a desired text string 4) It can exclude folders (like Windows, Programs, Documents and Settings) I have about 600,000 files, so I figured that all of the above were required for a reasonably fast search. I was unsure if I could use 4, but I installed UltraSearch based on your 'heads up'.
BEFORE I could work out how to do 4, the program had returned the single file I was looking for (which contained the word 'ToDo'). Thank you for your recommendation, Rob. or to post comments. I thank the author for his labor in collecting the best candidates but i'd like to make two disagreements. 1 Windows 7 best? Tis to snort! '.
Copernic Desktop Search Home
its indexing is a PITA and system-resource gobbler,. its interface is far inferior to most others.while, as the windows secrets page details, it is tuneable, that's only at the cost of work, time!, and a minimum aptitude i don't have much of a life, so I'm eager not to spend what little i have on. like this. My second point: it's ALL garbage.
Copernic Desktop Search Corporate
Yes, i know that sounds like more troll ranting, but it's true: like software uninstallers, these apps.never. find or uninstall all that's there. Or at least i've never seen an app that does either.
PS: Both Locate32 and AgentRansack used to have HD forms that made it possible to pick individual drives, but in newer versions that's now impossible- one must choose one drive, or all. Progress marches on. PPS: August 18. I was using Agent Ransack today only because anything is better than Micros.t's Search for a search of my.cbr's yes, with search-subfolders checked. It completely missed a dozen in a sub-folder. I wouldn't say the makers are liars, just optimists.
As i said, it's ALL.hot wet smelly brown stuff. Justified cyncism aside: if you know of one that's substantially more accurate, please share it with the rest of us!. or to post comments. I am using Fileseek (for a some months now, and I am very happy with it. No database to store the information, Every time all files in selected folders are scanned, for matching patterns in filename or content. It is fast enough for me - especially when I can specify selective patterns or selective folders.
And when I want to scan all drives, I know that i can take a little coffee break. The payable version has a lot of options, but the freeware version gives me almost all I need. I am only missing the automatic upgrade feature, but I can live with it.
Bart. or to post comments. You may want to check out Docfetcher again. Version 1.1.12 seems to include MP3's, and at least jpeg/jpg among images. It has no issues on windows 7 for me (e.g.
No 64-bit java problems). Because it is portable and I'm mostly interested in searching my pdf library, it has become my new indexer. I had been looking for a capable portable desktop indexer one for quite some time and had been previously disappointing. Docfetcher looks to be getting 3 updates per year the last couple years so it's being supported currently as well. or to post comments. That's strange - I've been using Everything version 1.2.1.371 for many years and it definitely doesn't have to rebuild its indexes after a reboot (though if it detects that changes have occurred since it last ran it needs to update the index to reflect them, which takes very little time unless the changes have been very extensive).
And it has caused no problems with Windows Explorer on Win2K (which is where I generally use it). A quick run of the current version (also on Win2K even though it's not supposed to run there) doesn't rebuild the database either when the program is completely exited and then restarted, though changes to the index seem to get incorporated less immediately for some reason (possibly a difference in set-up values - I just performed a quick check using defaults). or to post comments.
Do you face the problem: it is more difficult to find a favorite bookmark item from the more and more bookmarks in IE favorites? Do you feel discourager when faced the empty IE browser favorites after reinstalled system by preventing virus? Do you surf internet with not only Internet Explorer, but also FireFox,Safari,Chrome and Opera? But you find that is is very difficult to share the bookmark data from the different browsers? It's time to use UrlPaster Bookmark Manager!
UrlPaster bookmark manager is a green portable desktop bookmark management.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |